Botas, Alvaro; Rodríguez, Ricardo J; Vaisanen, Teemu; Zdzichowski, Patrycjusz
Counterfeiting and Defending the Digital Forensic Process Proceedings Article
In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM), pp. 1966–1971, IEEE, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: anti-forensics, categorization, forensics
@inproceedings{BRVZ-CEWE-15,
title = {Counterfeiting and Defending the Digital Forensic Process},
author = {Alvaro Botas and Ricardo J Rodríguez and Teemu Vaisanen and Patrycjusz Zdzichowski},
url = {http://webdiis.unizar.es/~ricardo/files/papers/BRVZ-CEWE-15.pdf},
doi = {10.1109/CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM.2015.291},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM)},
pages = {1966--1971},
publisher = {IEEE},
abstract = {During the last years, criminals have become aware of how digital evidences that lead them to courts and jail are collected and analyzed. Hence, they have started to develop anti-forensic techniques to evade, hamper, or nullify their evidences. Nowadays, these techniques are broadly used by criminals, causing the forensic analysis to be in a state of decay. To defeat against these techniques, forensic analyst need to first identify
them, and then to mitigate somehow their effects. In this paper, we review the anti-forensic techniques and propose a new taxonomy that relates them to the initial phase of a forensic process mainly affected by each technique. Furthermore, we introduce mitigation techniques for these anti-forensic techniques, considering the chance to overcome the anti-forensic techniques and the difficulty to apply them.},
keywords = {anti-forensics, categorization, forensics},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
During the last years, criminals have become aware of how digital evidences that lead them to courts and jail are collected and analyzed. Hence, they have started to develop anti-forensic techniques to evade, hamper, or nullify their evidences. Nowadays, these techniques are broadly used by criminals, causing the forensic analysis to be in a state of decay. To defeat against these techniques, forensic analyst need to first identify
them, and then to mitigate somehow their effects. In this paper, we review the anti-forensic techniques and propose a new taxonomy that relates them to the initial phase of a forensic process mainly affected by each technique. Furthermore, we introduce mitigation techniques for these anti-forensic techniques, considering the chance to overcome the anti-forensic techniques and the difficulty to apply them.
them, and then to mitigate somehow their effects. In this paper, we review the anti-forensic techniques and propose a new taxonomy that relates them to the initial phase of a forensic process mainly affected by each technique. Furthermore, we introduce mitigation techniques for these anti-forensic techniques, considering the chance to overcome the anti-forensic techniques and the difficulty to apply them.